Corinne
McKamey argues in her case study about the differences between being a researcher
and a teacher. She realizes that by being the type of teacher that is willing
to fight for her students’ rights, she “loses” power from being a researcher. She also focuses on the different understandings
of what it means to be someone who cares and someone who does not, and understanding
the meaning from immigrants.
For
example “She cautions a teacher’s gaze may function to regulate student’s
behavior, for example, holding students quietly seated in classroom rows, and
may also function to limit dialogue between teacher and students.” Which in
certain classrooms there are certain teachers that feel good about that, they
believe it is not their duty to not cross boundaries. Whereas there are other
teachers that, “For example, a teacher might care for a student by asking about
her emotional wellbeing…” Another
scenario is when Mrs. McKamey helped ‘save’ a student from wasting time outside
an auditorium, “…one of the first days of school, I met Nam, a Vietnamese
immigrant student. Nam had been sitting in the auditorium for two days waiting
to be transferred to a high school closer to his home…” Since no one in the
school had no idea what to do with Nam, Mrs. McKamey decided to use her power
as a teacher to help Nam get to where he needed to go and he did. The
interesting part about this is even though it was a good deed Mrs. McKamey felt
guilty and ashamed, which is when she felt that her, “…decision to help Nam
resulted in gains for me in a teacher role and losses for me as a researcher
(Luttrell 2000). In helping Nam, I gained sense of power and control through
making decisions and actions within a familiar institutional logic.” I never
thought about it that way, I never truly realized that researchers had a
certain image that if it was challenged could end up costing a huge damage. I
honestly would see it as people that were very interested in finding out
information and they would ask a ton of questions and do a huge case study on
the topic.
After
reading this case study it opened my eyes to realizing just because one person
might think asking a student about their day or helping them get help like Nam might
seem heroic; but you cannot just see it in your own perspective. In order to
work with youth you really have to make sure that just because you think one
thing is acceptable, you have to sometimes step back before offending youth to
the point that they never want to come back to the program. At times it might
be hard because as we discussed in class it is normal for someone who has a
degree to be given more respect and attention because of its power of being in
a higher education level then someone else. But just because you do, does not necessarily
mean that you have the right to have a close minded way of thinking and allow
the youth to take charge.


Veronica- I agree, what is acceptable for one student is not always acceptable for another. I sometimes find it hard to establish that boundary at first meeting. How do we figure this out without offending them?
ReplyDelete